SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Tech
  • 🛰️ A Technique to Identify Covert Threats

🛰️ A Technique to Identify Covert Threats

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 11 May 2025 / Published in Tech

🛰️ A Technique to Identify Covert Threats

Spread the love

How to Reveal Hidden Signals Below the Noise Floor

🧠 Most covert threats aren’t loud. They’re quiet, subtle, and designed to hide—not just from ordinary scanners, but from trained professionals using standard settings.

That’s why we’re introducing a proven, field-tested method to reveal these threats:

“The Noise Floor Sweep Differential Technique.”

With just two waterfall scans — one deep and one shallow — you can build a profile of every hidden signal in your environment.


🎯 The Goal: Reveal Hidden or Obfuscated Signals

Most spectrum analyzers set the noise floor too high by default (e.g., -110 dB).
But covert signals often sit at -130 dB to -165 dB — well below what you’d ever see on a normal sweep.

These hidden signals are still there, still transmitting — but they’ve been engineered to sit just below where most operators are looking.


🧪 The Method

🔁 Step 1: High-Resolution Waterfall Sweep (Deep Scan)

  • ✅ Set your RBW (Resolution Bandwidth) to 9 Hz.
  • ✅ Use a dynamic range of at least 80–90 dB.
  • ✅ Set the noise floor to at least -165 dB.
  • ✅ Let the waterfall run for 2 minutes (or more).
  • ✅ Take screenshots and export raw data (if possible).

💡 This is your “deep scan.” It will show even the faintest carrier, pulse, or comb that’s otherwise hidden.


🧁 Step 2: High-Resolution Waterfall Sweep (Shallow Scan)

  • ✅ Use the same RBW (9 Hz).
  • ✅ But now set the noise floor to -110 dB.
  • ✅ Run for 2 minutes again, same conditions.
  • ✅ Take another screenshot.

💡 This is your “control scan.” It simulates what most RF sweeps would pick up — meaning everything not seen here is likely covert.


🔎 Step 3: Compare the Results

🧮 Side-by-side, the difference is massive:

SettingDeep Scan (-165 dB)Shallow Scan (-110 dB)
Comb Signals✅ Visible❌ Hidden
Pulsed Carriers✅ Intermittent blips❌ Inaudible
Bio-coupled RF✅ Detected near field❌ Ghosted
Background Noise✅ Smooth gradient✅ Flattened

Everything that shows up only in the deep scan is a covert signal, anomalous carrier, or low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) threat.


🧰 Why This Works

  • Covert signals are engineered to hide just below detection thresholds.
  • Most RF sweepers never go below -110 dB, especially during quick scans.
  • Ultra-low RBW + deep dynamic range lets you see what’s actually there.
  • By comparing both scans, you effectively build a “difference map” of threats.

📁 Your Threat Library Starts Here

Every operator should build a screenshot archive of:

  • Comb patterns
  • Pulsed signals
  • Body-reactive emissions
  • Directional shifts across antenna angles

With time, you’ll know exactly what’s supposed to be there — and what isn’t.


🧠 Final Thoughts

You don’t need $100,000 equipment to catch covert threats.
You need the right technique and a sharp eye.

Hidden signals rely on you never looking deep enough.
Now you’re looking.

🎯 This method puts you back in control — not just detecting signals, but proving which ones are engineered to avoid detection.

What you can read next

FCC Allocation Chart
Neural Jamming Collar Concept
Radio Telescope

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Intra-oral Electronic Tracking Device
  • Long‑Range Tracking
  • AI Designed Human Tracking at a Distance
  • Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors
  • Retroreflectors

Recent Comments

  1. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  2. David Terry on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  3. test on The Community has Been Sold Out
  4. CRAIG LAFOREST on Debunking ICAACT Phase III Jesse Beltran
  5. Patricia Gatten on The Community has Been Sold Out

Recent Posts

  • Intra-oral Electronic Tracking Device

    Spread the loveComprehensive Report on US Paten...
  • Long‑Range Tracking

    Spread the love🔭 The Human Radar: Long‑Range Tr...
  • AI Designed Human Tracking at a Distance

    Spread the loveAi Designed these so its probabl...
  • Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors

    Spread the loveAdvanced Detection of Retrorefle...
  • Retroreflectors

    Spread the love🛰️🔦 The Truth About Retroreflect...

Recent Comments

  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  • David Terry on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  • test on The Community has Been Sold Out
  • CRAIG LAFOREST on Debunking ICAACT Phase III Jesse Beltran
  • Patricia Gatten on The Community has Been Sold Out

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Physical Security
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP