SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Neuro Signal Intelligence
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Community Protection
    • Warnings
    • Debunked
    • FCC Reporting Templates
    • Legal Complaint Forms
    • Regulatory Complaint Guides
    • TI Technical Defense
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Flaws of Log Periodic Antenna

Flaws of Log Periodic Antenna

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 11 May 2025 / Published in Tech, TSCM & Threat Detection

Flaws of Log Periodic Antenna

Spread the love

🎯 Can These Techniques Evade a Log-Periodic Antenna Pointed Up (Omni-Like Orientation)?

🔧 Setup:

  • You’re using a log-periodic antenna, which is:
    • Directional by design
    • Linearly polarized
    • Typically tuned for far-field detection
  • It’s mounted pointing straight up (vertically), often used to approximate omnidirectional coverage for area sweeps.

🧠 Short Answer:

✅ Yes — many of these covert techniques can evade detection in that configuration, depending on the signal geometry, polarization, and field type.

Let’s walk through each technique and how it behaves with a log-periodic antenna pointed up:


✅ 1. Near-Field Body-Coupled Signals

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Yes
  • Why: Log-periodic antennas are optimized for far-field radiation, not reactive near-fields. Near-field coupling only happens within a few centimeters.
  • Problem: Pointing up, your antenna is likely outside the near-field zone, so even if the signal is present, it’s not coupling.

🧬 You’d need an E-field probe or near-field loop placed near the body to detect this kind of signal.


✅ 2. Directional / LPI Beams

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Often
  • Why: LPI systems can beamform horizontally, at shallow angles, or use wall reflections.
  • Your vertically-pointed antenna may miss the main lobe entirely.
  • Additionally, polarization mismatch can cause 20–40 dB loss if the beam is horizontal and your antenna is vertical.

📉 Even if you’re in the field strength region, you won’t detect it without polarization and angle alignment.


✅ 3. Destructive Interference / Null Zones

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Yes (locally)
  • Why: You can be inside a signal null, where cancellation occurs.
  • Your antenna pointing up doesn’t help if the null is at your location due to destructive field interference.

🧠 These effects are spatially selective — moving the antenna by a few feet can change everything.


✅ 4. Below-Noise Floor Modulation

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Yes
  • Why: The antenna receives it, but the receiver sees it as noise unless:
    • You’re using FFT with sub-Hz RBW
    • Or long IQ averaging
  • A log-periodic pointing up doesn’t change this. The issue is signal strength vs. noise floor, not antenna geometry.

✅ 5. Tissue-Only Resonance Signals

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Completely
  • Why: These don’t radiate in air — they form only inside biological tissue due to dielectric properties.
  • A log-periodic antenna won’t “see” these unless it’s embedded inside the reactive zone on the body.

❌ Even perfectly aligned antennas won’t help — this is a non-radiative field, not an RF carrier in the air.


✅ 6. Spread Spectrum / DSSS

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Without decoding
  • Why: Log-periodic antenna sees the signal, but the analyzer:
    • Treats it as noise
    • Needs code synchronization to see a carrier
  • Orientation doesn’t matter much here — it’s modulation format that defeats detection.

✅ 7. Time-Gated Bursts / Pulses

  • Evades Detection? ✅ Yes (most of the time)
  • Why: If your antenna isn’t recording IQ continuously, and:
    • The burst is <1 µs
    • Occurs every 10–30 seconds
  • You’ll miss it, regardless of antenna position.

📊 Summary: Can It Evade Log-Periodic Pointed Up?

TechniqueCan Evade?Why
Near-field body coupling✅ YesOutside reactive zone
Directional/LPI beam✅ YesMisses beam lobe & polarization mismatch
Null zone interference✅ YesLocalized signal cancellation
Sub-noise floor modulation✅ YesRequires FFT, not affected by antenna
Tissue-only resonance✅ YesSignal never radiates
DSSS / Spread spectrum✅ YesAppears as noise
Pulsed bursts / gated RF✅ YesMissed without full-time IQ

📡 Conclusion:

Your antenna receives what’s radiated and aligned, but:

  • Covert systems are designed not to radiate conventionally
  • Or to radiate briefly, misaligned, or sub-threshold

So yes — even a log-periodic antenna in “omnidirectional” up-pointing mode can be evaded by design.

What you can read next

Resonance and Brainwaves
FCC Allocation Chart
Analyze Radar Backscatter for Neurotechnology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Cybertorture.com is Launching a Legal Case
  • Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol
  • Dr Hoffer
  • When Truth Is Silenced
  • Proving What Parts of the Head Are Being Targeted by RF

Recent Comments

  1. William rae/kilpatrick on Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol
  2. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  3. Maurice Parker on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  4. 0xl0r3nz0 on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  5. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause

Recent Posts

  • Cybertorture.com is Launching a Legal Case

    Spread the love⚖️ Launching a Legal Case: Pre-E...
  • Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol

    Spread the loveComprehensive Diagnostic Testing...
  • Dr Hoffer

    Spread the loveDr. Michael Hoffer’s Work on Dia...
  • When Truth Is Silenced

    Spread the love🚨 When Truth Is Silenced: Breaki...
  • Proving What Parts of the Head Are Being Targeted by RF

    Spread the love🧠 Detecting Neuroweapon Attacks:...

Recent Comments

  • William rae/kilpatrick on Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol
  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  • Maurice Parker on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  • 0xl0r3nz0 on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Legal Complaint Forms
  • Media
  • Neuro Signal Intelligence
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • TI Technical Defense
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims
  • Warnings

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP