SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.

Home › Forums › Debunked › RF detectors and EMF meters can not find frequencies

RF detectors and EMF meters can not find frequencies

Home › Forums › Debunked › RF detectors and EMF meters can not find frequencies

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 month, 1 week ago by cybertortureinfo@proton.me.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 17, 2025 at 4:00 am #2017
    cybertortureinfo@proton.me
    Keymaster

    ⚠️ Why RF Detectors and EMF Meters Can’t Detect Implants – Here’s the Science
    Lately, I’ve seen a growing number of people online claiming they can “detect implants” or “covert frequencies” using RF detectors, TriField meters, or EMF readers. I understand the concern — many people are experiencing real symptoms and searching for answers — but we need to be accurate and technical if we’re going to find the truth.

    Let’s break this down properly:

    ❌ RF Detectors and EMF Meters Are Not Signal Intelligence Tools
    RF detectors are very basic tools. They alert when there is any radio frequency energy present — regardless of what it is. That could mean:

    Wi-Fi

    Bluetooth

    Cell phone towers

    Smart meters

    Your neighbor’s microwave

    They do not identify:

    What the frequency is

    What kind of signal it is (digital, analog, modulated, etc.)

    Where it’s coming from

    Whether it’s dangerous or not

    If it’s intentional or just ambient

    📉 Same Goes for EMF Meters and TriField Meters
    These tools measure electromagnetic fields, but they’re extremely prone to false positives. A perfect example:

    📽️ I’ve seen a demo by an actual electrical engineer showing a body EMF meter that spikes when he simply sits next to a lamp or power cord. The human body acts like an antenna — and being close to 60Hz power lines (from wall outlets or lamps) causes EMF readings to go up dramatically.

    This doesn’t mean you’re being attacked — it just means you’re in an environment with common AC power.

    🧠 What You Actually Need to Detect Covert Implants
    If we’re talking about serious signal detection, you need SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) capabilities:

    ✅ Key Requirements:
    A high-resolution spectrum analyzer with sub-kHz RBW (resolution bandwidth — ideally 300 Hz or lower)

    Waterfall display to track how the signal behaves over time

    IQ capture to analyze or demodulate the signal

    Software to identify modulation, decode payload, or geolocate the source

    Without this, you’re not detecting implants — you’re detecting your Wi-Fi router or the wall outlet next to you.

    🔬 Real RF Analysis = Signal + Time + Context
    Implants, if they even use RF, would likely transmit:

    At very low power

    At intermittent intervals

    On non-obvious frequencies

    Potentially modulated to blend into noise

    This cannot be detected by handheld RF meters or consumer-grade tools. These devices were never designed for this level of precision.

    🛑 Don’t Let Scammers Take Advantage of You
    A lot of people online are either misinformed or knowingly profiting off fear. If someone claims to detect implants using a $150 EMF meter or an Amazon RF scanner with blinking lights — walk away.

    Real signal detection is a forensic process, not a guessing game.

    ✅ Final Word
    If you’re serious about detection, work with a team that uses:

    Proper test environments (shielded, controlled)

    SDR or spectrum analyzers with documented specs

    Actual signal analysis software — not just beeping boxes

    Let’s stay scientific. Let’s stay rational. Let’s keep calling out the misinformation.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Recent Posts

  • Intra-oral Electronic Tracking Device
  • Long‑Range Tracking
  • AI Designed Human Tracking at a Distance
  • Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors
  • Retroreflectors

Recent Comments

  1. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  2. David Terry on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  3. test on The Community has Been Sold Out
  4. CRAIG LAFOREST on Debunking ICAACT Phase III Jesse Beltran
  5. Patricia Gatten on The Community has Been Sold Out

Recent Posts

  • Intra-oral Electronic Tracking Device

    Comprehensive Report on US Patent 6,239,705 B1 ...
  • Long‑Range Tracking

    🔭 The Human Radar: Long‑Range Tracking via Biom...
  • AI Designed Human Tracking at a Distance

    Ai Designed these so its probably how they are ...
  • Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors

    Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors: Exposing...
  • Retroreflectors

    🛰️🔦 The Truth About Retroreflectors: From Cold ...

Recent Comments

  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  • David Terry on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  • test on The Community has Been Sold Out
  • CRAIG LAFOREST on Debunking ICAACT Phase III Jesse Beltran
  • Patricia Gatten on The Community has Been Sold Out

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Physical Security
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP