Letter Sent to Kingsley AAA Security
Dear Mr. Kingsley,
I’m reaching out following a detailed review of multiple scan reports you’ve produced and distributed. This message is intended to address serious technical flaws, equipment misuse, and questionable professional claims that directly impact the credibility of your work.
⚠️ 1. Your Reports Lack Scientific Validity
After analyzing several of your scan documents, it is clear they consistently lack the minimum data required to verify signal threats:
- No IQ data is ever provided to allow for third-party analysis or demodulation
- No waterfall plots or time-domain views are included, preventing signal pattern recognition
- Reported “signals of interest” are offered with no modulation classification, no frequency hopping analysis, and no forensic reproducibility
- Devices appear to operate at a -90 dBm noise floor, which is over 60 dB too shallow to detect covert or LPI signals used in real attacks
- You consistently use extremely low resolution bandwidths incapable of identifying spread-spectrum or narrowband pulses used by state-level actors
For comparison:
📡 Verified attacks I have documented occur at levels as low as -150 dBm, often buried in the noise floor and only visible using high-grade analyzers with extremely fine RBW and dynamic range.
❌ 2. Misuse of NLJD Devices – Unsafe and Ineffective
You are reportedly using a Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) as part of your scans. If true, this raises both legal and ethical concerns:
- NLJDs emit high-intensity RF bursts that can cause temporary blindness, tissue damage, and interference with medical implants
- Their resolution and bandwidth are far too coarse to detect nanotechnology, coatings, or subdermal MEMS implants
- NLJDs are not approved for biological scanning and were never designed to detect neural RF pathways or embedded passive tech
If you did review the manual, you’d know these devices are built to locate consumer-grade electronics—not advanced state tools.
🧠 3. “REI Training” Is Not Evidence of Intelligence-Level Capability
You often reference REI Systems training or equipment as a credential, but let’s be clear:
- REI does not teach how to find state-level covert tech
- Their training is FBI-approved and FBI-censored, with core detection methodologies stripped of anything that challenges U.S. operations
- If you hold any additional certifications or intelligence-clearance-level training, I request you state them clearly and provide documentation
If your work relies solely on REI commercial training, then it is not sufficient to assert that your reports detect implants, foreign intelligence tech, or classified V2K methods.
🔍 Request for Immediate Clarification
In the interest of transparency and scientific credibility, I’m requesting:
- IQ data and device metadata from your recent scans
- Exact NLJD model and radiation output specs
- Safety protocols used when scanning people (esp. near face/head)
- Any certifications or non-REI credentials you hold
- Explanation of how your system could detect anything below -120 dBm
⚖️ This is About Protection
Using low-quality tools and issuing vague, unverifiable “signals of interest” reports hurts real victims. They take this into court. They use it to make life-altering decisions. And if it’s based on flawed methodology, you are doing real harm—even if your intent is good.
I invite you to respond publicly or privately, and if you’re confident in your process, I welcome a publicly recorded, technically moderated call to discuss methodology and evidence. Let’s raise the bar—not lower it.
Sincerely,
#######
TSCM Professional
“Scientific integrity is not optional when lives are on the line.”
Providing Communication for complete transparency