SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Neuro Signal Intelligence
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Community Protection
    • Warnings
    • Debunked
    • FCC Reporting Templates
    • Legal Complaint Forms
    • Regulatory Complaint Guides
    • TI Technical Defense
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Intelligence
  • UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft

UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Saturday, 31 May 2025 / Published in Intelligence

UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft

Spread the love

🌐 UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft for Global Adoption

📅 May 21, 2025
🧠 Topic: Ethics of Neurotechnology
🏛️ By: UNESCO at the 43rd General Conference (Oct 30 – Nov 13, 2025)


🧬 What Is Neurotechnology?

“Devices, systems, and procedures—hardware or software—that measure, access, monitor, analyze, predict, or modulate the nervous system.”
— UNESCO, May 2025

From healing neurological disorders to decoding your thoughts, neurotechnology holds incredible power. But with that comes enormous ethical risk — surveillance, manipulation, and mental privacy violations are no longer science fiction.


📜 The Recommendation: A New Global Standard

UNESCO’s “Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology” sets out a historic international framework to protect human rights in the face of accelerating brain-tech developments.

It covers:

  • 🛡️ Autonomy & Freedom of Thought
  • 🧠 Mental Privacy & Consent
  • ⚖️ Justice & Due Process
  • 🧬 Enhancement & Equity
  • 💤 Dream Manipulation & Neuromarketing
  • 🧒 Protection of Children & Vulnerable Groups
  • 🌍 Global Governance & Oversight

🚨 Key Concerns: From Healing to Hacking Minds

🧠 Good: Restores speech, mobility, cognition
🚫 Danger: Tracks, manipulates, or coerces thought
🎯 Dystopian Risks:

  • Subconscious manipulation (“nudging”)
  • Dream marketing
  • Brainwave-based surveillance
  • Emotion or thought decoding without consent

🧠 “Your PIN number to your bank account” could one day be stolen from your mind.
— Nita Farahany, WEF23


🧠 Ethical Impact Areas

1. 🛡️ Freedom of Thought & Consent

  • Consent must be opt-in, informed, revocable, and adaptive.
  • Special protections for children, disabled, mentally ill, or power-imbalanced groups.

“Neurotechnology should never be used to exert undue influence or manipulation.”
— UNESCO Draft, 2025


2. ⚖️ No Thought Crimes, No Mind Surveillance

🚫 Prohibited Uses:

  • Brainwave interrogation
  • Surveillance of mental states
  • Brain-based loyalty or ideological profiling
  • Coercive neurotech in law enforcement or courts

👩‍⚖️ Individuals must retain mental sovereignty, even when accused of crimes.


3. 📈 Enhancement & Equity

👨‍🔬 Memory or intelligence enhancement must:

  • Be equitable
  • Avoid discrimination
  • Be reversible and safe

💡 Countries must avoid widening global divides between the neuro-enhanced elite and the rest of society.


4. 🧠💤 Neuromarketing, Nudging & Dream Intrusion

📢 Strict Bans Recommended:

  • 🧠 Real-time neural data for political/commercial nudging
  • 💤 Marketing during sleep
  • 🧪 Covert closed-loop behavioral systems
  • 🤖 Unconsented cognitive state profiling in AI recommenders

🧪 UNESCO’s Action Plan

📊 Monitoring & Evaluation Tools

  • Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM)
  • Ethical Impact Assessments (EIA)
  • Effectiveness Reviews

🧠 Global Observatory & Forum

  • Tracks tech + ethics convergence (AI, quantum, neurotech)
  • Shares best practices, data, and scientific insights
  • Establishes expert networks across regions

🇺🇳 Responsibilities of Member States

✅ Mandated Actions:

  • Enforce opt-in, revocable consent
  • Ban manipulation and coercion
  • Protect mental integrity in courtrooms
  • Prevent neuro-discrimination and inequality
  • Incentivize ethical innovation
  • Promote open science and fair IP policies

📢 Final Vote in November

🧠 “The Recommendation will be the first global normative instrument in this critically important field.”
— UNESCO, 2025

This milestone marks the beginning of international neuro-rights — recognizing freedom of thought as a fundamental frontier in the 21st century.


🔍 Core Confirmations from the UNESCO Ethics Draft PDF:

✅ Definition of Neurotechnology

“Devices, systems, and procedures—encompassing both hardware and software—that directly access, monitor, analyze, predict or modulate the nervous system…”
📌 Confirmed in section I.2 Definitions, page 12–14.

✅ Concerns Over Thought Surveillance & Manipulation

“Neurotechnology should never be used to exert undue influence or manipulation…”
📌 Section III.2.2 Self-determination and Freedom of Thought — pages 17–18.

✅ Mental Privacy & Neural Data Protection

“Mental privacy is fundamental… The collection, processing… must be conducted with free and informed consent…”
📌 Section III.2.3 Protection of Neural and Cognitive Biometric Data — page 18.

✅ On “Nudging”, Sleep Ads, Neuromarketing

While the terms “nudging”, “dream marketing”, and “neuromarketing” do not appear verbatim in the first 100 pages, equivalent concepts are clearly addressed under:

  • Closed-loop systems
  • Subconscious influence
  • Mental state inference
  • Coercive or manipulative application restrictions
    📌 Sections IV.1 and IV.3 (Policy Actions), pages 20–22+

✅ BCIs, Enhancement, and Equity

“Neurotechnology for enhancement… raises equity, consent, and dignity issues.”
📌 Section III.2.1 and III.2.9 — pages 16–20

✅ UNESCO Implementation Program

Outlines:

  • Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM)
  • Ethical Impact Assessment (EIA)
  • UNESCO Observatory
  • Expert network & global platform
    📌 Section 20 of the Recommendation — pages 10–11 and 20

✅ Governmental and Judicial Use Restrictions

“Neurotechnology should not be used for interrogation, coercion, surveillance of mental states, or social control…”
📌 Section IV.1 GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT, USE AND REGULATION — pages 20–21


❗Additional Confirmations:

  • The RAND Corporation’s opinion on BCIs is not part of this PDF — it’s referenced in your summary but comes from external commentary.
  • Nita Farahany’s quote is also external, not in this draft, but accurately reflects the concerns UNESCO raises about decoding internal mental states.

UNESCO Draft Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology: Final Report | Policy Commons

What you can read next

Long‑Range Tracking
Trends Since 2004
Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Cybertorture.com is Launching a Legal Case
  • Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol
  • Dr Hoffer
  • When Truth Is Silenced
  • Proving What Parts of the Head Are Being Targeted by RF

Recent Comments

  1. William rae/kilpatrick on Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol
  2. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  3. Maurice Parker on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  4. 0xl0r3nz0 on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  5. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause

Recent Posts

  • Cybertorture.com is Launching a Legal Case

    Spread the love⚖️ Launching a Legal Case: Pre-E...
  • Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol

    Spread the loveComprehensive Diagnostic Testing...
  • Dr Hoffer

    Spread the loveDr. Michael Hoffer’s Work on Dia...
  • When Truth Is Silenced

    Spread the love🚨 When Truth Is Silenced: Breaki...
  • Proving What Parts of the Head Are Being Targeted by RF

    Spread the love🧠 Detecting Neuroweapon Attacks:...

Recent Comments

  • William rae/kilpatrick on Dr Hoffers Diagnostic Testing Protocol
  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  • Maurice Parker on Synthetic Telepathy & Signal Intelligence Toolkit
  • 0xl0r3nz0 on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Legal Complaint Forms
  • Media
  • Neuro Signal Intelligence
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • TI Technical Defense
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims
  • Warnings

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP