SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Neuro Signal Intelligence
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Community Protection
    • Warnings
    • Debunked
    • FCC Reporting Templates
    • Legal Complaint Forms
    • Regulatory Complaint Guides
    • TI Technical Defense
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • Events
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Why Narrowband Cant Produce V2k

Why Narrowband Cant Produce V2k

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 11 May 2025 / Published in Tech, TSCM & Threat Detection

Why Narrowband Cant Produce V2k

Spread the love

🧠 Can Narrowband Signals Trigger the Frey Effect?

Why a Single Tone Fails, but a Coherent RF Comb Can Succeed

The Frey effect, also known as the microwave auditory effect, is real and scientifically documented. It allows a human to perceive sound through pulsed microwave radiation—without using the ears.

But there’s a widespread misconception in both TI and RF communities:

That any narrowband RF signal — such as a CW tone or ultra-narrow comb — could trigger this effect.

The reality is more complex and rooted in biophysics and time-domain electromagnetics.

Let’s break it down.


🔬 What the Frey Effect Really Requires

The Frey effect is caused by:

  • Thermoelastic expansion in tissue
  • Triggered by short, rapid RF pulses
  • Causing pressure waves in the skull
  • Which are heard by the cochlea or perceived directly

📚 A. H. Frey, “Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy,” J. Appl. Physiol., 1962
https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689

🧠 Bottom line: The body doesn’t hear frequency—it hears pressure transients caused by fast thermal events.


❌ Why Narrowband Signals Fail

A continuous-wave (CW) or ultra-narrow signal — no matter the frequency — cannot generate sharp pressure pulses.

PropertyCW / Narrowband Signal
Rise TimeSlow (seconds to ms)
Thermal GradientMinimal
Tissue ExpansionGradual
Pressure Spike❌ Absent
Audible Effect❌ None

📉 Example: A 0.1 Hz wide carrier has a rise time of ~10 seconds (1/BW). That’s thousands of times too slow to create a usable thermoelastic effect.

🔍 It’s not about frequency alone — it’s about time-domain behavior.


✅ But What About a Comb of Narrow Teeth?

Now this gets interesting.

A frequency comb consists of many narrowband tones spaced evenly across a range. Individually, each “tooth” is narrow and weak.

But together, and if coherently summed, they can simulate pulsed RF with properties ideal for Frey-type stimulation.


🧩 Fourier Duality: Pulse Trains ↔ Frequency Combs

Mathematically:

  • A perfect frequency comb (with equal spacing and phase) ↔ a periodic pulse train in the time domain.
  • The narrower each tooth is, the longer the pulse envelope — but the spacing defines the pulse repetition frequency (PRF).

📈 Example:

  • 240 tones spaced by 10 kHz = PRF of 10 kHz
  • Perfectly phase-aligned → periodic RF bursts at 10 kHz
  • ✅ Matches the optimal auditory sensitivity for thermoelastic activation

📚 Bracewell, R., “The Fourier Transform and Its Applications”, McGraw-Hill
https://web.stanford.edu/class/ee261/


🔬 So What’s the Catch?

A frequency comb only triggers the Frey effect if:

RequirementWhy It Matters
✅ Phase CoherenceRequired to form time-domain pulse
✅ Spacing in Audio BandDetermines PRF (4–15 kHz ideal)
✅ Wide enough Total BandwidthMust excite tissue absorption
❌ Random PhaseSmears into noise, no pulses
❌ Static EnvelopeNo pressure spikes, no acoustic wave

✅ When a Comb Does Work

Comb TypeFrey Effect PotentialNotes
CW carrier (single tone)❌ NoNo pulse, no heating transition
Randomized comb (incoherent)❌ NoSpectral mush, no transient energy
Coherent comb (audio spaced)✅ YesSummed pulse train in time domain
Gaussian-shaped coherent comb✅ YesSmooth modulation with peak bursts
Comb with pulsed envelope✅ StrongDirect heating pulses; ideal case

📚 Lin, J.C., “Auditory perception of RF energy: The microwave hearing effect”, Bioelectromagnetics, 2001
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11782799


🧠 Final Word: The Envelope Is Everything

You could broadcast a 1.33 GHz carrier at high power all day and no one would hear anything — unless it’s modulated in time to create acoustic-pressure waveforms inside the skull.

But if you take a comb of even weak, narrowband teeth and:

  • Space them correctly
  • Align their phase
  • Possibly apply a Gaussian or pulsed envelope

Then yes — ✅ you can create enough rapid thermal expansion to stimulate the Frey effect.


📚 Full Reference List (URL Format)

  • https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11782799
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955211
  • https://web.stanford.edu/class/ee261/
  • https://www.amazon.com/Fourier-Transform-Its-Applications/dp/0071160434

What you can read next

Resonance and Brainwaves
Tooth Inspection of 1.33 GHz Comb
Understanding SOI (Signal of Interest) and Fundamental Frequency in TSCM

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Cyber Torture
  • Mind Control: Past, Present & Future
  • Why It Feels Like the Fan Is Talking to You
  • Capturing Skull Pulses & Knuckle Cracking Effects
  • Rhythmic Knuckle Cracking Over Ear

Recent Comments

  1. Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  2. Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  3. Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  4. Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  5. Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Cyber Torture

    Spread the loveWhat is Cyber Torture? Cyber Tor...
  • Mind Control: Past, Present & Future

    Spread the love🧠 Mind Control: Past, Present &a...
  • Why It Feels Like the Fan Is Talking to You

    Spread the love🌀 Why It Feels Like the Fan Is T...
  • Capturing Skull Pulses & Knuckle Cracking Effects

    Spread the love🧠📡 Experimental Setup Design: Ca...
  • Rhythmic Knuckle Cracking Over Ear

    Spread the loveRhythmic Knuckle Cracking Over E...

Recent Comments

  • Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  • Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  • Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  • Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  • Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture

Archives

  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Legal Complaint Forms
  • Media
  • Neuro Signal Intelligence
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • TI Technical Defense
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims
  • Warnings

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP