SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Debunked
  • Debunking Smart Meters

Debunking Smart Meters

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Friday, 18 April 2025 / Published in Debunked

Debunking Smart Meters

Spread the love

📡 Debunking Smart Meter Myths: What the Data Really Shows

Smart meters have become a focal point in discussions about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and potential health risks. Some individuals express concerns about the radiofrequency (RF) emissions from these devices, fearing adverse health effects. To address these concerns, I utilized the GQ EMF-390 Multi-Field EMF Meter, a device designed to detect and analyze EMF radiation, including RF signals from smart meters.​


🔍 Understanding Smart Meter Emissions

Smart meters communicate usage data to utility companies via RF transmissions. Using the GQ EMF-390, I observed that my smart meter emitted a data packet approximately every 60 seconds, each around 14 kilobytes in size. These transmissions are brief and infrequent, resulting in minimal overall RF exposure.​


📊 Comparing RF Exposure Levels

It’s essential to contextualize the RF emissions from smart meters relative to other common household devices:​

  • Cell Phones: When in use, they emit continuous RF signals close to the body.​
  • Wi-Fi Routers: Operate continuously, emitting RF signals to maintain network connectivity.​Walmart.com
  • Microwave Ovens: Emit high levels of RF energy during operation, though they are shielded to prevent leakage.​

In contrast, smart meters transmit data intermittently and at lower power levels. Studies have shown that the RF exposure from smart meters is significantly lower than that from these everyday devices.​


🧬 Health Assessments and Regulatory Standards

Extensive research has been conducted to evaluate the health implications of RF exposure from smart meters:​

  • The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) reported that RF emissions from smart meters are well below the limits set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and pose no known health risks. ​
  • Health Canada concluded that RF exposure from smart meters is far below the levels that could cause health concerns, emphasizing that these devices transmit data infrequently and for very short durations. ​
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that, to date, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by exposure to low-level RF fields from devices like smart meters. ​

✅ Conclusion

While it’s natural to have concerns about new technologies, the evidence indicates that smart meters emit RF radiation at levels far below those associated with health risks. The brief and infrequent transmissions, combined with low power output, result in minimal exposure—especially when compared to common household devices. Using tools like the GQ EMF-390 can provide valuable insights, but it’s crucial to interpret the data within the broader context of scientific research and established safety standards.

What you can read next

Scam Scan Reports
Quantum Communications
The Magnet Scam

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Intra-oral Electronic Tracking Device
  • Long‑Range Tracking
  • AI Designed Human Tracking at a Distance
  • Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors
  • Retroreflectors

Recent Comments

  1. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  2. David Terry on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  3. test on The Community has Been Sold Out
  4. CRAIG LAFOREST on Debunking ICAACT Phase III Jesse Beltran
  5. Patricia Gatten on The Community has Been Sold Out

Recent Posts

  • Intra-oral Electronic Tracking Device

    Spread the loveComprehensive Report on US Paten...
  • Long‑Range Tracking

    Spread the love🔭 The Human Radar: Long‑Range Tr...
  • AI Designed Human Tracking at a Distance

    Spread the loveAi Designed these so its probabl...
  • Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors

    Spread the loveAdvanced Detection of Retrorefle...
  • Retroreflectors

    Spread the love🛰️🔦 The Truth About Retroreflect...

Recent Comments

  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  • David Terry on Only Real Use Case for a HackRF
  • test on The Community has Been Sold Out
  • CRAIG LAFOREST on Debunking ICAACT Phase III Jesse Beltran
  • Patricia Gatten on The Community has Been Sold Out

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Physical Security
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP