Subject: Formal Challenge Regarding Scientifically Invalid Claims and Technically Inadequate RF Sweeps Dear Mr. Tolces, I am writing to issue a formal technical challenge to the methods, claims, and reports you publish and promote under Advanced Electronic Security Company. As a licensed TSCM professional and contributor to the CyberTorture Debunked Archive, I have carefully reviewed the RF analysis practices

Subject: Cease Fraudulent Claims Regarding the “Cyber Shield” Device – Technical and Legal Violations Identified Dear Mr. Ruble, I am writing you directly regarding your continued marketing and sale of the so-called “Cyber Shield” device, which you are reportedly charging victims upwards of $2,500 for. After a comprehensive technical review and independent replication attempt of

Dear Dr. Staniger, I am writing to formally raise concerns and demand clarification regarding several public claims and private reports you have authored on nanotoxicology, Morgellons, and targeted individuals. This message is also to put you on notice regarding potential legal action should retaliation be taken against those who publicly challenge your findings. ❌ 1.

Dear Mr. Kingsley, I’m reaching out following a detailed review of multiple scan reports you’ve produced and distributed. This message is intended to address serious technical flaws, equipment misuse, and questionable professional claims that directly impact the credibility of your work. ⚠️ 1. Your Reports Lack Scientific Validity After analyzing several of your scan documents,

🚨 Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International Exposing Gatekeeping, Fraudulent Technology, and Misleading Scans in the TI Community As a committed investigator and advocate for targeted individuals, I am issuing a direct and public challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International for: ✅ Repeatedly gatekeeping scientific truth✅ Promoting fraudulent individuals and unverified technology✅

Can Normal NLJDs Detect Nanotech? No, normal NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection. Reasoning: Are Normal NLJDs Suitable for Use on the Human Body? No, normal NLJDs are not suitable for use on the human body. Reasoning: How Your Custom Build Differs Your NLJD design addresses these limitations for nanotech detection: However, even

🛡️ Does Grounding Help or Hurt During RF Attacks? Scenario Grounding Helps You Grounding Helps Attacker Capacitive coupling (electric fields) ✅ Yes — reduces your body voltage by draining induced charge ❌ No benefit to attacker Magnetic field (inductive) coupling 🚫 No — grounding usually has little to no effect 🚫 No help for attacker

⚡ Flyback Driver as an RF Jammer? Let’s Get Real About Its Capabilities 🔧📡 The flyback driver—commonly found in high-voltage hobbyist circuits—is often hyped as a “cheap RF jammer” in targeted individual communities. But does it really operate in the GHz spectrum? And more importantly, can it jam or interfere with advanced systems like 1.33

🚫 Debunked: Why Aaronia Spectran V4 Analyzers Are Useless for Real TSCM or Covert Threat Detection Many targeted individuals (TIs) are misled into using the Aaronia SPECTRAN V4 series — like the HF-6060 V4, HF-6080 V4, or HF-60100 V4 — thinking they’re doing real RF forensics. 📡 Spoiler: These tools are not designed for forensic

🛑 Why an Oscilloscope is the Wrong Tool for Finding Covert RF Threats Many targeted individuals and amateur investigators make the mistake of thinking an oscilloscope is the ultimate tool for detecting covert electromagnetic threats. But while oscilloscopes are extremely useful in electronics engineering, they are completely unsuitable for TSCM (Technical Surveillance Counter-Measures) work when