Understanding Cyber Torture
What is Cyber Torture?
Cyber Torture, recognized as an Enhanced Interrogation Technique (EIT) by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, involves the remote use of advanced technological methods to interrogate, monitor, and inflict physical and psychological harm on individuals. This includes continuous remote interrogation facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI), remote neural monitoring (RNM), and torture through weaponized radio frequency (RF) technologies, designed to induce physical harm via nonlinear effects, pressure waves, and other means. These methods frequently incorporate mind-control technologies like the Frey Effect, used for transmitting voices directly into individuals’ heads.
Victims report experiences such as:
- 🔹 Invisible projectile attacks: Sensations akin to being struck by tiny projectiles, visibly documented by impacts on aluminum foil and skin.
- 🔹 Localized pain fields: Intense sensations similar to bee stings covering specific areas of the body.
- 🔹 Pulsating head sensations: Frequently occurring at night, described as memory disruption attempts.
- 🔹 Sonic-style attacks: High-frequency sounds transmitted via “voice to skull” (V2K) technologies causing severe distress and respiratory difficulty.
Historical Context: Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs)
Initially authorized after the September 11, 2001 attacks by President George W. Bush, EITs were classified CIA practices used on detainees. Legal frameworks at the time relied on classified presidential directives and Department of Justice memos, with periodic congressional oversight.
However, public exposure and legal scrutiny dramatically changed their status:
- ⚖️ June 29, 2006 (Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557): The U.S. Supreme Court ruled detainees were protected under the Geneva Conventions.
- 📜 2006: Congress enacted the Military Commissions Act, prosecuting violations of humane treatment.
- 🖊️ 2009: President Barack Obama’s Executive Order 13491 outlawed EITs, mandating adherence to the Army Field Manual.
Currently, EITs remain illegal, monitored through congressional oversight, DOJ compliance checks, and whistleblower protections.
Current Legal Status
All U.S. interrogations must strictly adhere to the Army Field Manual (AFM) on Human Intelligence Collector Operations, explicitly prohibiting:
- 🚫 Torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.
- 🚫 Physical pain, electric shocks, mock executions, or coercive interrogation methods.
The AFM emphasizes rapport-building and lawful incentive-based questioning, explicitly forbidding coercive techniques.
Remote Neural Monitoring and Directed Energy Weapons
Despite exclusion from official military doctrine, remote neural monitoring and directed energy weapon torture remain frequently reported in allegations of cyber torture. Official U.S. policy and doctrine do not recognize or authorize these practices:
| Technique | Mentioned in Army Manual? | Permitted? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) | No | No | Not officially recognized |
| Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) | No | No | Not officially recognized |
| Enhanced Interrogation (EITs) | No | No | Explicitly banned |
| Rapport-based Questioning | Yes | Yes | The only authorized interrogation approach |
Legal Framework and Violations
Cyber torture practices, including unauthorized RNM and DEW usage, violate several legal standards and human rights laws:
- 📘 Geneva Conventions: Protect individuals from torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.
- 🇺🇸 U.S. Constitution (8th Amendment): Prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
- 🖋️ Executive Order 13491 (2009): Legally prohibits U.S. agencies from using enhanced interrogation techniques, requiring adherence to humane interrogation methods outlined in the AFM.
- 📜 Military Commissions Act (2006): Establishes legal consequences for violations of humane treatment.
Oversight and Enforcement
Official prohibitions are enforced through robust oversight mechanisms:
- 🏛️ Congressional Oversight Committees: Monitor intelligence and military interrogation practices.
- ⚖️ Department of Justice: Ensures compliance through legal scrutiny and prosecution.
- 📋 Internal Compliance Offices: Ensure agency-level adherence and accountability.
- 🛡️ Whistleblower Protections: Safeguard individuals reporting abuses, promoting transparency.
Call to Action
Cyber torture remains an urgent concern, frequently obscured by secrecy and skepticism. Vigilance, transparency, and rigorous legal enforcement are essential. Victims and advocates must meticulously document evidence, leverage existing legal frameworks, and actively engage oversight mechanisms to counteract unauthorized practices. Public education, investigative journalism, and international oversight remain critical for achieving accountability and justice.
Eleni Triantafyllopoulou
Hi I live in Greece and in 2022 after repotting a policeman I got into this surveillance programme with horrific results and the participation of what can only describe as a private army of civilians. I had a case of defamation and I lost my work. Can you please help me in Athens Greece? I was electrically teazed on my sleep and I could not close my eyes without seeing light. I was receiving extreme heat throughout the day for three years. Can you please suggest some lawyer in Athens? Thank you Needless to say UN is useless hete
If there is any way you can document the evidence i need that would help to prove everything i am going through then i am willing to pay for it and i would like you to call me. I paid Dr. Staninger a good amount of money for services that she said was going to give me the evidence i need to have proof so that i could be able to fight in court which turned out to be a lie and everything her services provided to me in terms of identifying variables to confirm evidence and give examples that determine circumstances of my situation and explain my case so that a solution would be clear and easy to consider in my favor unfortunately was all fabricated with fake evidence and introduced to present lies to the court knowing would be dismissed because at that point what else can you expect. She convinced me to believe there were satellite signals and we had to prove they were supposedly being sent from an implant that i had to see a plastic surgeon and pay her $800 for which she pretended to surgically extract from behind my ear so we could pretend that implant was real and try to use it to trick the judge to believe evidence of implants. It was all fabricated so that she could get paid to sell me on a lawsuit knowing it would be dismissed and she did it anyway. For me it was completely pointless and nothing but a big scam that left me broke afterwards.
I can guide you but I cant do it for you. It’s to much work and I dont accept money all my information is a free service. Please read all 170 articles on the site then get back to me when your caught up.