Remote Mind Control Technology: An Archived Scientific Investigation into EMF-Based Neural Influence
🔍 Introduction
This blog post presents a detailed investigation into a rare and often-overlooked document titled “Remote Mind Control Technology” by Anna Keeler, originally published in MindNet Journal, Vol. 1, No. 23a. The article is publicly available via the Internet Archive:
🔗 Anna Keeler – Remote Mind Control Technology (Archive.org)
The content outlines the use of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) as tools to manipulate biological systems, potentially enabling behavior modification, neural monitoring, and even auditory hallucinations—without any physical implants.
Through historical analysis and contemporary scientific cross-reference, this post compiles evidence that supports the article’s major claims and provides a solid foundation for those seeking documentation of covert neurological influence technologies.
🪤 Key Research Cited and Verified
1. Eldon Byrd (Naval Surface Weapons Center)
Claim: Low-intensity electromagnetic fields can modulate animal behavior and affect biological processes.
Evidence:
- Byrd conducted experiments where EMFs altered mammalian growth and behavior, including making animals relax, lie down, or become docile.
- Archived reference: Byrd Interview & Analysis
2. Dr. Ross Adey (Brain Research Institute / Loma Linda University)
Claim: EMFs can induce calcium efflux from brain tissues, impacting neural communication.
Evidence:
- Dr. Adey showed that modulated RF signals influence neurotransmitter activity by altering calcium ion movement.
- Supporting reference: Ross Adey Bioeffects of Modulated Fields
3. Dr. José Delgado
Claim: EMFs can influence behavior without implants.
Evidence:
- Known for his bull experiment where he stopped a charging bull via a radio-frequency brain implant.
- Later experiments demonstrated non-contact behavior modulation using ELF (extremely low frequency) waves.
- Reference: Delgado, J.M.R. Physical Control of the Mind (WorldCat: Link)
4. J.F. Schapitz (MKULTRA-Affiliated Proposal, 1974)
Claim: Modulated EMFs can be used to implant ideas into the subconscious.
Evidence:
- His proposal to DARPA theorized that subliminal hypnosis could be triggered remotely.
- Portions of this work are referenced in declassified CIA MKULTRA files.
- Summary overview: Schapitz Experiments Reference
5. Dr. James Lin (University of Illinois)
Claim: Pulsed microwave energy can create auditory hallucinations (Voice-to-Skull).
Evidence:
- Lin is a key figure in understanding the “microwave auditory effect” (MAE), where brief pulses of microwaves cause individuals to perceive sounds internally.
- Key text: Lin, J.C. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications (Springer-Verlag, 1978)
🔮 Theoretical Applications of EMF-Based Mind Control
Based on the researchers above, Keeler suggests several potential applications:
- Remote mood modulation (via ELF/ULF exposure)
- Remote neural data acquisition (EEG and biofeedback signal extraction)
- Voice-to-skull communication (confirmed by auditory microwave effect)
- Sleep pattern interference / forced dreams
- Crowd control or behavior pacification
These possibilities are echoed in DARPA and military research agendas, including projects like:
- The Silent Talk Program (DARPA, 2009): Brain-to-brain communication using EEG decoding.
- CT2WS (Cognitive Technology Threat Warning System): Real-time neural pattern analysis for soldier use.
❌ Scientific and Ethical Implications
While the evidence shows compelling technical capability, the ethical and legal ramifications are severe:
- ❌ No informed consent in weaponized applications
- ❌ Use in civilian population suspected by many Targeted Individuals (TIs)
- ⚠️ Human rights violations per UN guidance on neuroscience ethics
UN Submission on non-consensual neurotechnology use:
🔎 Summary: What We Know Today
This isn’t science fiction. The archived Anna Keeler article predicted capabilities that are now echoed in:
- Declassified government proposals
- Peer-reviewed research in neuroscience
- Current DARPA and military funding programs
And most importantly: these technologies do not require implants.
For TIs and investigators, this archive is one of the earliest assembled bodies of public evidence pointing to covert neural influence methods in use at a distance.
💾 Download & Cite This Research
- Archive.org version of Anna Keeler’s article
- PDF: [Upload downloadable version on your site or attach ZIP archive]
✉️ Contact / Collaboration
If you have documents, whistleblower testimony, or additional research on EMF-based remote neural monitoring:
- Contact us securely at cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Let’s keep exposing the truth.