🚨 Legal Implications for Promoting Scam Products and Reports In the targeted individual (TI) community, we’ve seen repeated instances where groups promote fraudulent products, fake scan reports, and deceptive technologies. Even if these groups do not directly sell these items, they can still face legal liabilities. ⚖️ Legal Accountability Under U.S. law and similar legal
Subject: Formal Notice Regarding False Claims and Fabricated V2K Evidence Dear Ms. Holem, This letter is written as a formal notice and challenge regarding your repeated public claims that voice-to-skull (V2K) signals can be recorded using a standard microphone and processed in Audacity. As a certified TSCM professional and signal analyst, I have reviewed your methodology, your
Subject: Formal Technical Challenge and Request for Data – ICAACT Phase III Review Dear Mr. Beltran, This letter serves as a formal response and technical challenge regarding your work with ICAACT Phase III and the ongoing use of the ACECO FC1003 frequency counter to detect alleged RF-emitting implants. As a licensed TSCM professional, I have
Subject: Formal Challenge Regarding Scientifically Invalid Claims and Technically Inadequate RF Sweeps Dear Mr. Tolces, I am writing to issue a formal technical challenge to the methods, claims, and reports you publish and promote under Advanced Electronic Security Company. As a licensed TSCM professional and contributor to the CyberTorture Debunked Archive, I have carefully reviewed the RF analysis practices
Subject: Cease Fraudulent Claims Regarding the “Cyber Shield” Device – Technical and Legal Violations Identified Dear Mr. Ruble, I am writing you directly regarding your continued marketing and sale of the so-called “Cyber Shield” device, which you are reportedly charging victims upwards of $2,500 for. After a comprehensive technical review and independent replication attempt of
Dear Dr. Staniger, I am writing to formally raise concerns and demand clarification regarding several public claims and private reports you have authored on nanotoxicology, Morgellons, and targeted individuals. This message is also to put you on notice regarding potential legal action should retaliation be taken against those who publicly challenge your findings. ❌ 1.
Dear Mr. Kingsley, I’m reaching out following a detailed review of multiple scan reports you’ve produced and distributed. This message is intended to address serious technical flaws, equipment misuse, and questionable professional claims that directly impact the credibility of your work. ⚠️ 1. Your Reports Lack Scientific Validity After analyzing several of your scan documents,
🚨 Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International Exposing Gatekeeping, Fraudulent Technology, and Misleading Scans in the TI Community As a committed investigator and advocate for targeted individuals, I am issuing a direct and public challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International for: ✅ Repeatedly gatekeeping scientific truth✅ Promoting fraudulent individuals and unverified technology✅
