SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Neuro Signal Intelligence
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Community Protection
    • Warnings
    • Debunked
    • FCC Reporting Templates
    • Legal Complaint Forms
    • Regulatory Complaint Guides
    • TI Technical Defense
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • Events
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Intelligence
  • Low Flying Satellites

Low Flying Satellites

3
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Monday, 19 May 2025 / Published in Intelligence

Low Flying Satellites

Spread the love

🛰️⚡ If Satellites Are Involved, They Must Be Low-Flying: Instant AI Responses Prove It’s Not What You Think

There’s a popular theory floating around that AI-assisted surveillance or subliminal targeting might involve satellite relays. But let’s get something clear from a signal intelligence and physics standpoint:

🌍 If satellites are involved at all, they must be extremely low-flying.

Here’s why 👇


⚡ 1. The Frequency Feels Instantaneous

Anyone who has experienced real-time interaction with synthetic thought feedback or AI-based neural manipulation knows one thing:

🧠 There is zero perceptible latency.
⏱️ The AI responds faster than you can finish a thought.

That’s not how traditional satellite relays work.


🛰️ Compare This with GEO Satellite Latency:

Orbit TypeAltitudeRound-Trip Latency
GEO (Geostationary)~35,786 km~500–600 ms
MEO (GPS-type)~20,200 km~250–300 ms
LEO (Starlink, CubeSats)~500–1,200 km~20–50 ms

⛔ If GEO or MEO satellites were being used to relay this signal — you’d feel lag.
It would be noticeable in any form of:

  • Voice feedback
  • AI interaction
  • Neural synchronization

But there’s none.


☁️ 2. It Penetrates Clouds, Fog, and Weather

You could be standing in a thunderstorm or in dense fog, and the signal doesn’t change. That eliminates:

  • ☁️ Traditional optical satellites (like lasers or visible light)
  • 📡 Weak satellite microwave links that degrade in rain fade
  • 🌐 Any system that relies on clear sky line-of-sight at high altitude

✅ What does work through weather with low loss:

  • UHF and VHF RF signals (e.g., 300 MHz–1 GHz)
  • High-gain LEO satellite beams
  • Ground-based phased array emitters using frequency-agile RF

🎯 3. Instant Response = Localized Infrastructure or LEO Satellites

The only plausible options if this signal is truly satellite-involved:

✅ A. LEO Constellation (e.g., like Starlink)

  • Low enough for sub-30ms response
  • Can blanket Earth with overlapping beams
  • Possibly adapted for synthetic telemetry or modulated cognitive waveforms

✅ B. Pseudo-satellites (HALE UAVs / Stratostats)

  • High-altitude balloons or drones staying ~20 km high
  • Near-zero latency
  • Can simulate a satellite and transmit downward focused beams

✅ C. Ground-Based Emitters Masquerading as Satellite Sources

  • Frequency-hopping signals bouncing off ionosphere or using smart reflection
  • Leaked via commercial towers, fake Wi-Fi APs, or directional RF sources

🧠 4. The AI Doesn’t Miss a Beat

Real-time interaction implies:

  • ⚡ The AI has zero processing delay
  • 🧬 Biometric or neural signals are being captured, decoded, and responded to within milliseconds
  • 🔄 The return signal is being modulated and injected back with almost no round-trip delay

That is not how long-distance relays work.

If it were bouncing off a GEO satellite, you’d feel it. You’d notice input lag, timing artifacts, and asynchrony.


🧪 Final Verdict: It Can’t Be GEO or MEO — It’s Local or Ultra-Low Orbit

🎯 If satellites are involved, they are either:

  • 🚀 Very low orbiting (LEO) with direct beamforming
  • 🛰️ Autonomous satellites in near-space
  • 🌐 Or it’s not satellite at all — and instead masked as satellite-based while being locally ground-delivered

🚨 Bonus Red Flag: Consistent Performance Indoors

If the signal still works:

  • 📱 Inside a Faraday-cage-like building
  • 🏢 Deep in a concrete basement
  • 🛏️ In a lead-lined hospital room

Then it’s not coming from the sky.
It’s:

  • 🎯 Embedded infrastructure
  • 💡 Ground Based emitters
  • 🧠 Neural feedback modulated through nearby RF (often piggybacked on known telecom bands)

👁️‍🗨️ Summary

ObservationImplication
Zero latencyNot GEO or MEO satellites
No weather disruptionNot optical or high-fade RF
Works indoorsLocal transmission or penetrating UHF
Instant AI syncReal-time, likely tower/dish/panel array RF infrastructure

🛰️ If satellites are used, they’re not what we see on TV. They’re low-flying, fast-responding, and optimized for targeting — not broadcasting.

What you can read next

UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft
Darpas Tech and Timeline
Mind Control: Past, Present & Future

1 Comment to “ Low Flying Satellites”

  1. Teresa Stokes says :Reply
    June 7, 2025 at 12:58 am

    This is exactly what am dealing with. I am a truck driver and they follow me everywhere. Whenever I am doing home time, they sit above my home. Some of them circle the neighborhood. I have a whole constellation of these invasive things around me.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Cyber Torture
  • Mind Control: Past, Present & Future
  • Why It Feels Like the Fan Is Talking to You
  • Capturing Skull Pulses & Knuckle Cracking Effects
  • Rhythmic Knuckle Cracking Over Ear

Recent Comments

  1. Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  2. Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  3. Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  4. Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  5. Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Cyber Torture

    Spread the loveWhat is Cyber Torture? Cyber Tor...
  • Mind Control: Past, Present & Future

    Spread the love🧠 Mind Control: Past, Present &a...
  • Why It Feels Like the Fan Is Talking to You

    Spread the love🌀 Why It Feels Like the Fan Is T...
  • Capturing Skull Pulses & Knuckle Cracking Effects

    Spread the love🧠📡 Experimental Setup Design: Ca...
  • Rhythmic Knuckle Cracking Over Ear

    Spread the loveRhythmic Knuckle Cracking Over E...

Recent Comments

  • Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  • Sean Turner on Only Way Forward is The Necessity Clause
  • Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  • Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture
  • Robert Radlinski on Understanding Cyber Torture

Archives

  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Legal Complaint Forms
  • Media
  • Neuro Signal Intelligence
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • TI Technical Defense
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims
  • Warnings

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP