SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Why Narrowband Cant Produce V2k

Why Narrowband Cant Produce V2k

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 11 May 2025 / Published in Tech, TSCM & Threat Detection

Why Narrowband Cant Produce V2k

Spread the love

🧠 Can Narrowband Signals Trigger the Frey Effect?

Why a Single Tone Fails, but a Coherent RF Comb Can Succeed

The Frey effect, also known as the microwave auditory effect, is real and scientifically documented. It allows a human to perceive sound through pulsed microwave radiation—without using the ears.

But there’s a widespread misconception in both TI and RF communities:

That any narrowband RF signal — such as a CW tone or ultra-narrow comb — could trigger this effect.

The reality is more complex and rooted in biophysics and time-domain electromagnetics.

Let’s break it down.


🔬 What the Frey Effect Really Requires

The Frey effect is caused by:

  • Thermoelastic expansion in tissue
  • Triggered by short, rapid RF pulses
  • Causing pressure waves in the skull
  • Which are heard by the cochlea or perceived directly

📚 A. H. Frey, “Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy,” J. Appl. Physiol., 1962
https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689

🧠 Bottom line: The body doesn’t hear frequency—it hears pressure transients caused by fast thermal events.


❌ Why Narrowband Signals Fail

A continuous-wave (CW) or ultra-narrow signal — no matter the frequency — cannot generate sharp pressure pulses.

PropertyCW / Narrowband Signal
Rise TimeSlow (seconds to ms)
Thermal GradientMinimal
Tissue ExpansionGradual
Pressure Spike❌ Absent
Audible Effect❌ None

📉 Example: A 0.1 Hz wide carrier has a rise time of ~10 seconds (1/BW). That’s thousands of times too slow to create a usable thermoelastic effect.

🔍 It’s not about frequency alone — it’s about time-domain behavior.


✅ But What About a Comb of Narrow Teeth?

Now this gets interesting.

A frequency comb consists of many narrowband tones spaced evenly across a range. Individually, each “tooth” is narrow and weak.

But together, and if coherently summed, they can simulate pulsed RF with properties ideal for Frey-type stimulation.


🧩 Fourier Duality: Pulse Trains ↔ Frequency Combs

Mathematically:

  • A perfect frequency comb (with equal spacing and phase) ↔ a periodic pulse train in the time domain.
  • The narrower each tooth is, the longer the pulse envelope — but the spacing defines the pulse repetition frequency (PRF).

📈 Example:

  • 240 tones spaced by 10 kHz = PRF of 10 kHz
  • Perfectly phase-aligned → periodic RF bursts at 10 kHz
  • ✅ Matches the optimal auditory sensitivity for thermoelastic activation

📚 Bracewell, R., “The Fourier Transform and Its Applications”, McGraw-Hill
https://web.stanford.edu/class/ee261/


🔬 So What’s the Catch?

A frequency comb only triggers the Frey effect if:

RequirementWhy It Matters
✅ Phase CoherenceRequired to form time-domain pulse
✅ Spacing in Audio BandDetermines PRF (4–15 kHz ideal)
✅ Wide enough Total BandwidthMust excite tissue absorption
❌ Random PhaseSmears into noise, no pulses
❌ Static EnvelopeNo pressure spikes, no acoustic wave

✅ When a Comb Does Work

Comb TypeFrey Effect PotentialNotes
CW carrier (single tone)❌ NoNo pulse, no heating transition
Randomized comb (incoherent)❌ NoSpectral mush, no transient energy
Coherent comb (audio spaced)✅ YesSummed pulse train in time domain
Gaussian-shaped coherent comb✅ YesSmooth modulation with peak bursts
Comb with pulsed envelope✅ StrongDirect heating pulses; ideal case

📚 Lin, J.C., “Auditory perception of RF energy: The microwave hearing effect”, Bioelectromagnetics, 2001
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11782799


🧠 Final Word: The Envelope Is Everything

You could broadcast a 1.33 GHz carrier at high power all day and no one would hear anything — unless it’s modulated in time to create acoustic-pressure waveforms inside the skull.

But if you take a comb of even weak, narrowband teeth and:

  • Space them correctly
  • Align their phase
  • Possibly apply a Gaussian or pulsed envelope

Then yes — ✅ you can create enough rapid thermal expansion to stimulate the Frey effect.


📚 Full Reference List (URL Format)

  • https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11782799
  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955211
  • https://web.stanford.edu/class/ee261/
  • https://www.amazon.com/Fourier-Transform-Its-Applications/dp/0071160434

What you can read next

Backscatter Brain-Computer Interfaces
DIY Contact Pad Antennas
No Experience Vibe Coding to Freedom

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Letter Sent to Amy Holem
  • Letter to Jesse Beltran
  • Letter Sent to Roger Tolces
  • Letter sent to David Ruble
  • Letter Sent to Dr Staniger

Recent Comments

  1. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Elf Waves Debunked for attacks – HAARP
  2. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Dave Case CD Scam
  3. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk
  4. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  5. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

Recent Posts

  • Letter Sent to Amy Holem

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Notice Regarding...
  • Letter to Jesse Beltran

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Technical Challe...
  • Letter Sent to Roger Tolces

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Challenge Regard...
  • Letter sent to David Ruble

    Spread the loveSubject: Cease Fraudulent Claims...
  • Letter Sent to Dr Staniger

    Spread the loveDear Dr. Staniger, I am writing ...

Recent Comments

  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Elf Waves Debunked for attacks – HAARP
  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Dave Case CD Scam
  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP