SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • New Techniques to Detect Covert Threats

New Techniques to Detect Covert Threats

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 11 May 2025 / Published in Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques, Tech

New Techniques to Detect Covert Threats

Spread the love

🧠 How to Detect Covert Signals Without Missing Them — A Technical Guide

Covert signals are often engineered to avoid your tools — not physics. You won’t miss them because your antenna fails; you’ll miss them because your process isn’t designed to catch what they’re doing.

Below are detailed methods to capture and reveal even the most evasive signal types.


✅ 1. Use Multiple Antenna Types and Positions

Threat TypeWhy You Miss ItWhat to Use
Near-field/reactive fieldsToo close to radiateE-field probe, magnetic loop, or sniffer coils placed near body/suspect object
Tissue-coupled signalsOnly form in the bodyContact capacitive sensor, touch probe
LPI directional beamsMissed due to angleSweep with rotatable Yagi or elevation-controlled LPDA
Null zones/interferenceDestructive cancellationMultiple probe points, move around during sweep

📌 Key Action: Don’t rely on one fixed antenna. Use:

  • Log-periodic for far-field sweeps
  • Magnetic loop or whip for low-frequency ELF/ULF
  • Probe near human subjects for body-coupled signals

✅ 2. Capture Raw IQ Continuously — Always

Why it’s essential:

  • Spectrum analyzers can only show what happens during a sweep.
  • Covert systems pulse, gate, or hop, so the sweep will often miss them entirely.

How to do it:

  • Use your BB60C or SDR with:
    • Raw IQ recording
    • Sample rate: 2 MS/s or higher
    • Duration: 10–30 minutes minimum
  • Tools: Spike Recorder, SDRangel, or custom Python scripts

📌 Store raw IQ for offline analysis. This allows:

  • Sub-Hz RBW (via large FFT window)
  • Time-slicing of microsecond events
  • Filtering and phase analysis not possible in real-time

✅ 3. Use Sub-Hz RBW Post-Processing

Why:

  • Many covert signals are <1 Hz wide, or modulate so slowly they appear as noise in standard RBW settings (e.g., 1 kHz).

How to do it:

  • After IQ capture, process it with:
    • scipy.fft() or numpy.fft in Python
    • Window size = total duration (e.g., 1000 seconds → 0.001 Hz resolution)

📌 This reveals:

  • Hidden combs
  • Low-frequency modulations
  • Pseudo-DC modulated carriers

✅ 4. Vary Polarization and Elevation

Why:

  • A vertically polarized antenna cannot detect horizontally polarized LPI beams — you lose 30–40 dB or more.
  • Many threats are sent in low-angle lateral waves, wall-reflected, or ceiling-bounced.

How to do it:

  • Repeat sweeps with antennas:
    • Oriented vertical and horizontal
    • Elevated on tripod or boom
    • Positioned high, low, and tilted

📌 Mount your antenna on a rotating gimbal for fast polarization swaps if possible.


✅ 5. Use Differential Field Analysis

Why:

  • Covert signals often form only when your body is in the field (biological demodulation).
  • Comparing field states with and without the target body reveals body-coupled threats.

How to do it:

  1. Record IQ or waterfall with antenna near target
  2. Move target (or you) away
  3. Record again in same position

📌 Subtract spectrograms. What disappears = body-coupled.


✅ 6. Apply Entropy & Kurtosis Analysis (Advanced)

Why:

  • Spread-spectrum signals don’t spike. They show up as statistical anomalies.
  • You can’t “see” them in dB terms, but you can spot their information density.

How to do it:

  • Run statistical scans on IQ using:
    • Spectral entropy
    • Spectral kurtosis (impulsiveness)
  • Tools: MATLAB, Python, GNURadio

📌 You’re detecting non-random structure in what looks like noise.


✅ 7. Time-Domain Analysis for Pulsed Signals

Why:

  • Ultra-short pulses (<1 µs) get lost in FFTs.
  • Real-time analyzers can’t trigger fast enough.

How to do it:

  • Plot amplitude (envelope) of IQ vs time:
pythonCopyEditenvelope = np.abs(iq_data)
plt.plot(envelope)

📌 Zoom in to find:

  • Repeating microbursts
  • Pulse trains
  • Event-driven emissions

✅ 8. Physically Move During Sweep

Why:

  • Destructive interference or beamforming nulls may block detection at your current spot.
  • Shifting a few inches can move you in or out of a lobe.

How to do it:

  • Sweep the same band from 3+ spatial positions.
  • Preferably, automate with stepper-mounted antenna or probe-on-boom.

📌 Compare patterns and log what appears/disappears per location.


✅ 9. Check Below 10 kHz for ELF Resonance

Why:

  • Some implants or field-generating systems are ELF-powered (e.g., 7.83 Hz Schumann mimicry).
  • BB60C doesn’t go below ~9 kHz — use separate ELF/VLF sensors.

How to do it:

  • Use:
    • Induction coils (handmade or RECON-based)
    • Audio preamps
    • FFT up to 30 seconds per frame

📌 Use oscilloscope or long FFT in Audacity/Matlab.


✅ 10. Correlate With Biological Feedback

Why:

  • If signals are tissue-reactive, you can use:
    • Accelerometers on skin
    • EEG for neural triggers
    • Audio via bone mic

How to do it:

  • Run waterfall/FFT synchronized with sensor readings
  • Look for correlation between spikes and biological response

📌 Example: Spike in field at 1.33 GHz → blink or twitch → confirm coupling.


📊 Final Checklist Summary

MethodPurposeTools/Tech Needed
Multiple antenna types/anglesDetect spatial/field anomaliesLog-periodic, probe, whip
Full IQ captureTime/frequency analysisBB60C, SDR, IQ recorder
Sub-Hz FFT post-analysisReveal ultra-narrow signalsPython, GNURadio, MATLAB
Rotate polarizationCatch mismatched signalsManual or motorized gimbal
Time vs. body comparisonDetect bio-resonanceSame probe, different body pos
Entropy/kurtosis scanSpot spread-spectrum maskingPython, Scipy, custom scripts
Envelope time-domain plotCatch pulses <1 µsPython or oscilloscope
ELF monitoringSub-10 kHz threatsInduction coil, VLF receiver
Sensor sync (biological)Confirm tissue-modulated RFAccelerometer, EEG, bone mic

What you can read next

Classifying a Signal
Advanced Detection of Retroreflectors
Spectrum Analyzer Comparison

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Letter Sent to Amy Holem
  • Letter to Jesse Beltran
  • Letter Sent to Roger Tolces
  • Letter sent to David Ruble
  • Letter Sent to Dr Staniger

Recent Comments

  1. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Elf Waves Debunked for attacks – HAARP
  2. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Dave Case CD Scam
  3. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk
  4. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  5. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

Recent Posts

  • Letter Sent to Amy Holem

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Notice Regarding...
  • Letter to Jesse Beltran

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Technical Challe...
  • Letter Sent to Roger Tolces

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Challenge Regard...
  • Letter sent to David Ruble

    Spread the loveSubject: Cease Fraudulent Claims...
  • Letter Sent to Dr Staniger

    Spread the loveDear Dr. Staniger, I am writing ...

Recent Comments

  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Elf Waves Debunked for attacks – HAARP
  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Dave Case CD Scam
  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP