SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terror—united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • How It Can Evade BB60C

How It Can Evade BB60C

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 11 May 2025 / Published in Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques, Tech

How It Can Evade BB60C

Spread the love

🎯 Why Some Signals Are Practically Undetectable — Even with the Signal Hound BB60C

🛰️ In the search for proof of directed energy and neurological interference technologies, tools like the Signal Hound BB60C are essential. But even this high-performance spectrum analyzer has limitations — and covert signal designers know exactly how to work around them.

While it’s not the “resolution” that’s too small, it’s the way timing, modulation, bandwidth manipulation, noise-camouflage, and biological coupling are used to exploit weaknesses in real-world RF analysis.

⚠️ In short: the signal is still there — you’re just not looking where or how it hides.


🧠 Let’s Break Down the Techniques That Evade BB60C Detection


✅ 1. Below the BB60C Noise Floor

  • The BB60C can see down to ~–160 dBm in ideal conditions.
  • However, covert signals can be engineered at –170 to –190 dBm, making them:
    • Only visible with sub-Hz RBW
    • Averaged over minutes or hours
    • Masked within thermal noise or nearby legitimate carriers
  • Tactics:
    • Near-field delivery to body (bypasses antenna)
    • Use of power-level shaping to blend into noise

🧪 Result: Not theoretically undetectable, but invisible in real-time or short scans. Requires hours of IQ averaging with post-processing.


✅ 2. Ultra-Narrowband Phase-Modulated Signals (<1 Hz Wide)

  • These are often used for subliminal communication, biological resonance, or carrier locking.
  • A signal 0.1 Hz wide will not resolve on the BB60C unless:
    • Sub-Hz RBW is used (not real-time capable)
    • FFT is run on long-capture IQ data
  • Appears as a single-bin rise or “DC-like” artifact buried in noise.

🧪 Detectable only by offline FFT analysis of IQ. Can mimic EM silence while being fully active.


✅ 3. Spread Spectrum / Low-Probability-of-Intercept (LPI) / DSSS

  • Military-grade stealth modulation using:
    • Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS)
    • Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS)
  • Spreads energy over multiple MHz with ultra-low power per Hz, staying under detection limits.
  • Without the key (de-spreading code), it appears as white noise.

🧪 Can only be detected statistically (e.g., entropy analysis). Indistinguishable from noise in normal BB60C scans.


✅ 4. Pulsed / Intermittent / Time-Gated Transmission

  • Transmits only for microseconds, sometimes once per minute or hour.
  • Often triggered by proximity, motion, or biometrics.
  • BB60C’s sweep-based detection may miss it entirely, unless:
    • Full IQ capture is running continuously
    • Post-processing is done with signal correlation

🧪 Common in tracking implants and event-based RF emission. Requires continuous high-rate recording to catch.


✅ 5. Resonant Signals That Form Only On/In the Body

  • No “RF signal” exists until the wavefront:
    • Mixes with ambient fields
    • Interferes in tissue, bone, or fluid resonance cavities
  • Examples:
    • Gaussian phase-locked combs
    • ELF-mixed high-frequency carriers
  • Analyzer sees nothing — but the targeted individual hears, feels, or responds due to internal demodulation.

🧬 Your body becomes the detector, not your antenna.


✅ 6. Non-EM Carrier Techniques

  • These include:
    • Acoustic ultrasound
    • Ultrasound demodulation
    • Scalar potentials (theoretical / disputed)
    • Capacitive body-coupled EMF
  • These do not radiate in traditional EM form.
  • They modulate the nervous system via indirect pathways and cannot be measured by any spectrum analyzer, including the BB60C.

⚠️ Completely outside the EM domain — requires ultrasound probes, accelerometers, or nonlinear junction detectors.


🧬 Summary Matrix

TechniqueBB60C Detectable?Detection Method
Weak sub-noise signals❌ Mostly notLong-duration IQ + averaging
Sub-Hz narrowband modulations❌ RarelyIQ + FFT with ≥1000s capture time
Spread-spectrum DSSS/FHSS❌ Without codeEntropy/statistical analysis + de-spreading
Pulsed or time-gated transmissions❓ SometimesReal-time IQ recording with millisecond timing
Tissue-only resonant effects❌ Not directlyBio-sensors, motion-coupled probes
Non-RF mechanisms (ultrasound/etc)❌ CompletelyAcoustic sensors, contact transducers, EEG/EMG

🔧 Final Thought:

No signal is truly undetectable — but most are impractical to detect using conventional tools unless you know what to expect and how to collect it.

The BB60C is an excellent spectrum analyzer, but it was not built to detect:

  • Brain-resonant waveforms
  • Subliminal backscatter
  • Near-field ELF modulation
  • Triggered implant pulses

You must adapt your tools and process:

  • Record IQ continuously
  • Use custom RBW in post-FFT
  • Capture sidebands, not just peaks
  • Use biofeedback and positioning to reveal hidden vectors

🛡️ The battlefield is now microscopic, time-gated, and biologically aware.
And the only way to detect it… is to go deeper than the default settings.

What you can read next

🛰️ A Technique to Identify Covert Threats
DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
Understanding the Importance of a Noise Floor at -172 dB

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Letter Sent to Amy Holem
  • Letter to Jesse Beltran
  • Letter Sent to Roger Tolces
  • Letter sent to David Ruble
  • Letter Sent to Dr Staniger

Recent Comments

  1. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Elf Waves Debunked for attacks – HAARP
  2. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Dave Case CD Scam
  3. Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk
  4. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  5. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

Recent Posts

  • Letter Sent to Amy Holem

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Notice Regarding...
  • Letter to Jesse Beltran

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Technical Challe...
  • Letter Sent to Roger Tolces

    Spread the loveSubject: Formal Challenge Regard...
  • Letter sent to David Ruble

    Spread the loveSubject: Cease Fraudulent Claims...
  • Letter Sent to Dr Staniger

    Spread the loveDear Dr. Staniger, I am writing ...

Recent Comments

  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Elf Waves Debunked for attacks – HAARP
  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Dave Case CD Scam
  • Open Challenge to Derek Robinson of PACTS International - Cyber Torture on Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP