SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

CREATE AN ACCOUNT FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

CREATE ACCOUNT

ALREADY HAVE AN ACCOUNT?
A global alliance against cyber torture and state-sponsored terrorβ€”united, informed, and ready to fight back.
  • LOGIN

Cyber Torture

  • Tech
    • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
    • TSCM & Threat Detection
    • Tools & Special Equipment
    • Spectrum Analysis
    • Experimental & DIY Projects
    • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
    • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
    • RF Fundamentals
  • Debunked
  • Legal
  • Survival
  • Victims
  • Evidence
  • Intelligence
  • Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Physical Security
  • Media
  • Forum
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Debunked
  • Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk

Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk

0
cybertortureinfo@proton.me
Sunday, 04 May 2025 / Published in Debunked

Roger Tolces Sweeps are Junk

Spread the love

Satellite Harassment Reading 2 Roger Tolces Brad Pike – YouTube

πŸ“‘ Spectrum Analyzer Review

FactorObservationAnalysis
Noise FloorAbout -90 dBmVery high for serious detection work.
Real covert threats (especially “satellite harassment” level) would likely be below -110 dBm.
This noise floor is not sensitive enough to detect small or low-power emissions.
RBW (Resolution Bandwidth)10 MHz (ResBW 10MHz)Huge! Very wide RBW.
At 10 MHz RBW, this analyzer averages together large slices of spectrum.
Meaning it can only see very strong, broad signals, not fine narrowband threats.
Video Bandwidth (VBW)7 MHz (VidBW 7MHz)Also very wide.
Very fast smoothing.
Even more detail lost on small, narrow signals.
Sweep Span5 GHz span (!), centered at 2.5 GHzHe’s sweeping from about 0 GHz to 5 GHz (huge).
This is an extremely wide span, meaning no detailed view at all.
Sweep Speed50 ms sweep timeVery fast β€” good for wide-area checks but very bad for detecting faint threats.
Reference Level-30 dBmVery high. He’s optimized the screen for looking at strong signals β€” not weak signals near the noise floor.
Displayed TracesStandard color-coded β€” red = higher amplitudeNormal display mode, but no peak hold trace is visible here.

πŸ›‘ Problems With This Setup

ProblemWhy It Matters
Noise floor too highWeak covert threats would be totally buried.
RBW too wide (10 MHz!)Narrow signals (such as beaconing, implants, etc.) would be invisible.
Span too large (5 GHz!)Impossible to spot fine signals hidden in specific bands.
Sweep speed too fast (50 ms)No long integration or deep signal capture.
Covert signals that are short bursts or low duty cycle would not even show up.
Reference Level too highOnly strong signals are being analyzed.
Weak signals compressed into lower screen range, making them almost invisible.

πŸ“‹ Quick Summary

ItemValueProper for Covert Detection?
Noise Floor~-90 dBm❌
RBW10 MHz❌
Sweep Span5 GHz❌
Sweep Speed50 ms❌

🎯 Final Evaluation

This setup is:

  • βœ… Fine for detecting very strong local RF noise (Wi-Fi routers, commercial broadcast signals, strong mobile devices).
  • ❌ Completely unsuitable for covert implant detection, satellite harassment detection, or fine-spectrum analysis.
  • ❌ Guaranteed to miss low-level, narrowband, or backscatter threats.

What you can read next

Cyber Shield Scam
Proving everything around you has EMF
Dave Case CD Scam

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft
  • Archived NLJD Tutorial
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection
  • DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  • Grounding Doesn’t Help

Recent Comments

  1. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  2. NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  3. cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Implants
  4. Steve on Implants
  5. ZIGGY on Exposing Bio-Track: The Archived Implantable GPS Tracker Marketed by Lightning GPS & BrickHouse Security

Recent Posts

  • UN Finalizes Historic Neurotech Ethics Draft

    Spread the love🌐 UN Finalizes Historic Neurotec...
  • Archived NLJD Tutorial

    Spread the love...
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection

    Spread the loveCan Normal NLJDs Detect Nanotech...
  • DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection

    Spread the loveDIY Non-Linear Junction Detector...
  • Grounding Doesn’t Help

    Spread the loveπŸ›‘οΈ Does Grounding Help or Hurt D...

Recent Comments

  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on Archived NLJD Tutorial
  • NLJDs are generally not suitable for nanotech detection - Cyber Torture on DIY Non-Linear Junction Detector (NLJD) for Nanotech Detection
  • cybertortureinfo@proton.me on Implants
  • Steve on Implants
  • ZIGGY on Exposing Bio-Track: The Archived Implantable GPS Tracker Marketed by Lightning GPS & BrickHouse Security

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025

Categories

  • Cyber Security
  • Debunked
  • Devices, Hardware & Reviews
  • Evidence
  • Experimental & DIY Projects
  • Intelligence
  • Legal
  • Media
  • Neurotechnology & Brain Interaction
  • Physical Security
  • RF Fundamentals
  • Signal Intelligence & Detection Techniques
  • Spectrum Analysis
  • Survival
  • Tech
  • Tools & Special Equipment
  • TSCM & Threat Detection
  • Victims

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest news straight to your inbox.

SOCIAL MEDIA

TOP