Scam Scan Reports

[cybertortureinfo@proton.me]

🚨 Debunking the “Frequency Scan Report” Scammers – What You Really Need to Know
There’s been a recent surge in people online claiming they can perform RF scan reports to detect “frequencies attacking people.” As someone who takes signal intelligence and RF forensics seriously, I want to clear up some massive misinformation going around. There are about seven individuals pushing these kinds of claims — and most of them are either totally misinformed or outright scammers.

❌ 1. The Frequency Counter in a Shielded Room Myth
One of these individuals claims they can detect targeted frequencies using a frequency counter inside a shielded environment. That’s completely misleading:

Frequency counters only show the strongest nearby signal — usually broadcast RF, Wi-Fi, cellular, etc.

Targeted signals are often subtle, embedded near the noise floor, and will be invisible to a frequency counter.

To even see them, you need a spectrum analyzer with sub-kHz RBW, waterfall display, and IQ capture.

🧢 2. The “$40K Weapons-Grade Analyzer” Scam
Another person claims they use a 40-year-old spectrum analyzer that “used to cost $40K.” It’s now worth less than $400, and it shows. In their videos:

There’s no waterfall display (essential for seeing time-domain signal behavior)

No IQ capture (you can’t demodulate or verify anything)

No signal classification — they just point at a frequency and make unverified claims

That’s not SIGINT — that’s playing with old test gear and calling it science.

📉 3. The RF Explorer and “Bodyguard Course” Crowd
Yet another person is using an RF Explorer, a hobbyist tool not suited for covert signal analysis:

No true RBW control

No IQ data

No signal logging

No capability to detect low-power or spread-spectrum threats

They combine this with a low-grade TSCM course made for executive protection, not signal forensics

This is not a professional setup, and it’s reckless to charge people based on what it shows.

⚠️ 4. Even the Real TSCM Guy Falls Short
One person does have legitimate TSCM credentials and uses a REI OSCOR in a secure underground lab. But even that gear has critical limitations:

📊 OSCOR (Blue/Green) Specs:
Minimum RBW: 12.2 kHz

Sweep bandwidth: 10 kHz to 24 GHz

Sweep speed: ~1 second per full sweep

That may seem advanced — but it’s not enough for serious covert signal detection:

Signals of interest may have a bandwidth of 300 Hz or less

Some threats are frequency hopping, bursted, or masked by noise

You cannot detect or decode them without sub-kHz RBW and time-synced IQ capture

This is like trying to find a whisper with a device that can only hear shouting.

🧠 What Real SIGINT Requires
Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) isn’t guessing or pointing at a screen — it involves:

Real-Time Spectrum Analysis with sub-kHz RBW

Waterfall views to track signal behavior over time

IQ capture for signal decoding and replay

Geolocation tools and antenna profiling

Signal classification libraries

Without this, no one can claim they’re identifying state-grade transmissions.

🛑 Final Thoughts
If someone is claiming to detect “weapons-grade” RF attacks with a frequency counter, an old analyzer, or RF Explorer — they’re either untrained or lying.

If they can’t provide IQ logs, frequency resolution specs, waterfall visualizations, or demodulation proof, then what they’re offering is junk science.

Demand real tech. Demand real methodology. Don’t fall for it.

[Author]

Posts